Over the past decade, technological innovation in Southeast Asia has largely been concentrated in a small cluster of major startup hubs. When technology is discussed in the region, the conversation often turns to Singapore’s venture capital ecosystem, Jakarta’s vast consumer market, or the growing tech scenes in major capitals such as Kuala Lumpur, Bangkok, Ho Chi Minh City and Manila.
Historically, these capitals have attracted a large share of regional funding, skilled talent and corporate headquarters. However, the next phase of ASEAN’s digital economy may be taking shape beyond these primary metropolises, with a more decentralised map of innovation emerging across secondary cities. This shift reflects several broader changes across regional markets, including improving digital infrastructure, evolving talent pools and growing local demand for technology.
We look at how a record two hundred billion peso pipeline is reshaping Philippine public equities
This is not simply a geographic shift. For founders, location can increasingly be a strategic decision shaped by access to specialised talent, industry knowledge, operating costs and customers. For investors and policymakers, it also raises a broader question: whether innovation can be distributed more evenly across the region without weakening the advantages that established capitals already provide.
Why startups are looking beyond capital cities
Several structural shifts are helping accelerate the transition towards a more distributed tech landscape. The increasing normalisation of remote and hybrid work has allowed startups to operate functional teams without requiring every engineer or designer to relocate to expensive capital cities. At the same time, cloud infrastructure and low-code software tools can reduce the need for startups to maintain a physical presence close to major technology infrastructure.
Strong regional universities can also act as talent anchors, producing steady streams of technical graduates and strengthening local startup talent pools. Regional accelerators and incubators are also extending support to emerging urban centres. Moreover, targeted government initiatives such as the establishment of designated provincial special economic zones or national digital development grants are actively lowering the operational barriers faced by regional founders.
Secondary cities are building their own tech niches
Looking across the region, emerging secondary hubs are developing distinct industry specialisations tailored to their local environments. In Indonesia, Bandung benefits from institutions such as the Bandung Institute of Technology (ITB), which has helped support a growing technology and startup ecosystem. Surabaya, meanwhile, has opportunities linked to its role as a major commercial, industrial and logistics centre.
In Malaysia, Penang is building on its long-standing semiconductor and manufacturing base, creating opportunities across hardware, industrial technology and related digital services while Johor capitalises on its proximity to Singapore in order to gain traction in data infrastructure and cross-border logistics. Vietnam’s Da Nang, meanwhile, has developed a growing technology ecosystem spanning areas such as software services, smart-city solutions and digital businesses. Each of these emerging hubs is developing specialisations shaped by its existing industries, talent pools and geographic advantages.
Local industries are creating different startup opportunities
Grounded in different economic realities, founders in secondary cities may be more likely to build startups that address problems closely tied to their local industries. Capital-city ecosystems, meanwhile, tend to offer stronger opportunities in areas such as consumer applications, quick-commerce delivery and consumer finance. In contrast, founders in secondary cities tend to operate much closer to traditional industries such as agriculture, manufacturing, port operations, and regional SME trade.
Such proximity puts them in a unique position to identify and solve high-value industrial bottlenecks and supply chain frictions that can remain largely invisible to capital-city ecosystems. Addressing these operational bottlenecks can create opportunities for secondary-city startups to build focused B2B products around specific industry needs.
Lower costs come with trade-offs
Despite the trade-offs, operating outside the capital can provide financial and structural benefits. One of the primary advantages is a lower cost structure. Reduced expenditure on commercial rents and manageable baseline payrolls help extend a startup’s operational runway, while potentially improving talent retention.
However, the trade-off remains that startups within secondary cities often encounter severe bottlenecks in their access to senior executive talent, such as seasoned product managers or growth leaders. Proximity to venture capital remains another hurdle for secondary-city startups. Early-stage funding is becoming more accessible in some regional markets, but later-stage capital remains concentrated in major financial centres.
What needs to change for regional ecosystems to grow
To cultivate more decentralised innovation, these structural gaps need to be addressed by governments, universities and investors. Higher education institutions need to strengthen technology-transfer offices so that academic research can be commercialised through viable spin-offs.
Regional angel networks and micro-VC funds also need to expand, allowing early-stage teams to grow without relocating to capitals simply to access seed funding. Finally, stronger links between regional startups and national corporate buyers could help create early commercial pilots and revenue opportunities, with industry-focused accelerators playing a role in building those connections.
Building a more distributed startup ecosystem
Ultimately, Southeast Asia’s startup landscape may become less dependent on a small number of dominant metropolitan hubs. A more distributed model could instead emerge, with specialised secondary hubs contributing different capabilities to the wider regional ecosystem.
With Penang building on its industrial base, Bandung strengthening its technology ecosystem, Cebu expanding its digital-services capabilities and Surabaya drawing on its commercial and logistics strengths, Southeast Asia is moving towards a more distributed model of startup development. Rather than replicating the same ecosystem in every city, regional hubs can build around their existing economic strengths while maintaining connections to the capital cities that provide access to larger pools of capital, talent and corporate networks. The result could be a more interconnected startup ecosystem, with innovation emerging closer to the industries and communities it seeks to transform.